[Ilya Somin] Pacific Legal Foundation Symposium on the 100th Anniversary of Euclid v. Ambler Realty

"A judge’s actions, even when done in her official capacity, do not bar criminal prosecution if the actions were done in violation of the criminal law." The post Wisconsin Judge Who Helped Illegal Alien Avoid ICE Suffers Legal Setback in Federal Criminal Case first appeared on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion.

The Ammons Law Firm has filed a lawsuit against Heritage Hotels and Resorts Inc. following a slip and fall accident at a hotel in Taos, New Mexico. The legal action seeks compensation for a hotel guest who suffered significant injuries due to allegedly dangerous conditions on the property. According to the lawsuit, the incident occurred when a guest was staying at the El Monte Sagrado Hotel and Spa Resort. It was a windy day, and the hotel grounds were covered in leaves, including walkways and pavers leading to guest rooms. The lawsuit alleges that these leaves were allowed to accumulate and remain on the walkways without proper removal, which created an unreasonably slippery and dangerous walking surface. The leaves allegedly concealed defects in the walkway, including loose and broken pavers that posed additional hazards to guests. While walking to her room, the guest allegedly stepped on a leaf-covered, broken paver and slipped and fell, suffering serious injuries. The legal…

The Ammons Law Firm has filed a lawsuit against Arnold Transportation Services, Inc., and others following a serious motor vehicle accident in Harris County, Texas. According to the complaint, a commercial vehicle owned by Arnold Transportation Services was operated by a company driver who changed lanes unsafely. The maneuver caused a chain reaction that ultimately led to a collision with the plaintiff’s vehicle, resulting in serious injuries. The lawsuit alleges the commercial driver failed to maintain a proper lookout, performed an unsafe lane change, and did not ensure the lane was clear before attempting the maneuver. These actions allegedly caused the crash and the plaintiff’s resulting harm. Arnold Transportation Services is also named as a defendant under a legal principle known as respondeat superior, which can hold employers liable for their drivers’ actions when performed within the scope of employment. The lawsuit further alleges independent…

At UpLevel Ops, we take a vendor-agnostic approach, adapting to the tools our clients already use rather than steering them into rigid ecosystems. This flexibility allows us to develop scalable, effective AI solutions across various platforms, including Google Workspace and Microsoft 365, with a focus on what works best in real-world workflows. Six months ago, I built a simple planner integration using Microsoft’s CoPilot bot-building features. The experience was rough, but functional. That early proof of concept suggested the platform might evolve into something more powerful over time. Recently, our engineering team revisited CoPilot to test that assumption. We wanted to see if it could match the performance of custom GPT-based tools we’ve deployed successfully in legal and enterprise contexts. But what we found was not an improved or matured experience. It was, in many ways, a regression. This raised a bigger question: Is the broader enterprise push to…

To help employers, the California Chamber of Commerce has put together a webpage with links to federal, state and CalChamber resources about immigration law. Federal resources on the page include links to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services I-9 Central; the M-274 handbook for employers; guidance for employers conducting internal employment eligibility verification Form I-9 audits; and the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Form I-9 inspection fact sheet. California resources include links to the Department of Industrial Relations page explaining rights for all workers; joint guidance from the Justice and Industrial Relations departments about the Immigrant Worker Protection Act (AB 450); and the Civil Rights Department immigration rights fact sheet. Also available are links to the Immigration Compliance for Small Businesses webinar presented by the California Office of the Small Business Advocate, in partnership with…

Navigating the world of grandparent visitation rights in Texas can be an emotional and complex journey. Grandparents often find themselves caught in the middle of family dynamics and legal hurdles while simply wanting to spend quality time with their grandchildren. The desire to maintain a loving bond with grandchildren can be met with various challenges, especially when disagreements arise with the children’s parents. Understanding the ins and outs of this process is key to ensuring that grandparents can preserve their important role within the family. For many, the legal aspect can seem daunting without proper guidance. The state of Texas has specific laws pertaining to grandparent visitation rights, and knowing these laws is crucial for those who wish to pursue time with their grandchildren through the court system. It’s important to explore how the law supports grandparent rights and the potential roadblocks that may arise. Professional advice can provide…

Illustration with Canva AIWhile many of us prepared to celebrate Independence Day last week, a group of employees from the Environmental Protection Agency were bravely speaking out about what they see as their boss “recklessly undermining the EPA mission” of protecting human health and the environment. In a now-infamous letter sent to EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, hundreds of current and former employees outlined five main concerns about the agency’s direction (undermining public trust, ignoring scientific consensus to benefit polluters, etc.) and expressed interest in working with him, along with members of Congress, to “restore EPA’s credibility as a premier scientific institution.” Instead, about 140 of these federal employees were placed on administrative leave just before the Fourth of July holiday, for a 10-day period — the maximum amount of leave for such an investigation — and are waiting anxiously to hear what the…

Seyfarth Synopsis: The freshly enacted “One Big Beautiful Bill” introduces two above-the-line tax deductions for tips and overtime wages. While these deductions offer potential savings for eligible workers, they come with new compliance obligations and nuanced legal considerations that employers will need to navigate carefully. With Sharpie in hand and military jets overhead, President Trump marked Independence Day by signing H.R. 1, best known as the “One Big Beautiful Bill,” or “OBBB”—into law. Among the bill’s myriad provisions are two long-promised pledges: no tax on tips, and no tax on overtime. Starting with the 2025 tax year, OBBB will allow workers below certain income thresholds to deduct up to $12,500 in “qualified overtime compensation” ($25,000 for on a joint return), and $25,000 in “qualified tips.” To emphasize the benefit for impacted workers, the White House has launched a calculator…

Duarte-Hernandez v. Rodriguez Divorce Case: Insights from a Dallas Divorce Attorney Divorce proceedings can be complex, especially when they involve disputes over community property, spousal support, and allegations of fraud. The case of Duarte-Hernandez v. Rodriguez, decided by the Court of Appeals of Texas in Austin, provides a compelling example of how Texas courts handle such issues. As a seasoned Dallas divorce attorney, I’ll break down the key elements of this case, offering insights into how it reflects common challenges in Texas divorce law and what it means for individuals navigating similar situations in Dallas. This article is designed to help you understand the legal principles involved and how an experienced attorney can guide you through a divorce. For personalized assistance, visit our divorce services page at https://www.dallasdivorcelawyer.com/practice-areas/. Case Overview: Duarte-Hernandez v. Rodriguez The Duarte-Hernandez v. Rodriguez case centered on…

In this episode of the State Bar of Texas Podcast, host Rocky Dhir welcomes Alicia Freeman of the Texas Lawyers’ Assistance Program (TLAP) to learn about tools to manage emotional distress—for lawyers and clients. Lawyers often face relentless exposure to stress and trauma, whether navigating emotionally charged areas of the law, handling high-stakes matters, or confronting a host of other pressures inherent to the profession. They discuss how to appropriately engage with clients’ emotional needs, set healthy boundaries, and provide necessary resources. Alicia Freeman is a licensed professional counselor with a master’s degree in clinical mental health counseling and a bachelor’s in political science. She is a TLAP clinical professional for the Texas Lawyers’ Assistance Program at the State Bar of Texas, the owner of Freeman Counseling and Consulting LLC, and co-host for the My Therapist Needs a Therapist podcast. Listen to the…

Cases and Controversies is a recurring series by Carolyn Shapiro, primarily focusing on the effects of the Supreme Court’s rulings, opinions, and procedures on the law, on other institutions, and on our constitutional democracy more generally. In Trump v. CASA, the Supreme Court announced that federal courts do not have the authority, under the Judiciary Act of 1789, to issue injunctions that prevent defendants from engaging in actions related to non-parties, even if those actions are illegal or unconstitutional. As others have pointed out, the practical consequences of the holding are unclear. The court described several mechanisms that might lead to comparably broad injunctive relief, including class actions, cases seeking to “set aside agency action” under the Administrative Procedure Act, and court orders that provide relief to third parties as an incidental but necessary part of providing “complete relief” to the plaintiffs. So litigation…

Does prior express written consent permit calls/texts to consumers during the Federal Communications Commission’s (“FCC”) proscribed quiet hours? As our readers know, the FCC is now considering this very issue insofar as it relates to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”). In the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright, which opened the door to judicial review of agency interpretation, the FCC’s anticipated ruling may not matter much. This is especially true after a more recent Supreme Court decision which is likely to further erode judicial deference to agency rulemaking and interpretation. Below, we briefly discuss the decision and go into detail about its impact on the issue of consent in TCPA quiet hours cases.   Consent and Quiet Hours Under The TCPA   In McLaughlin Chiropractic Assoc. Inc., McKesson Corp. (“McLaughlin”), the Supreme Court reviewed the Ninth…

For the Balkinization Symposium on Richard Primus, The Oldest Constitutional Question: Enumeration and Federal Power (Harvard University Press, 2025).Sandy Levinson  In February I contributed, under the title Who Is The Audience For This Book?, to a Balkinization symposium on Zack Price’s Constitutional Symmetry: Judging in a Divided Republic. I did not mean to be snarky or to criticize what is in fact an interesting book.  My point was simple, perhaps even simplistic:  The book was in effect a plea to the members of the Supreme Court to mend their ways and to adopt a more self-consciously politically “symmetrical” approach when writing opinions, especially in cases that touched on polarizing issues.  Thus, I argued, it really didn’t matter what the general response might be to Price’s arguments, many of which were certainly compelling, if the justices themselves did not read his book and change their behavior…

["[V]ery agreeable to the theorist, but utterly unfit for the practical purposes of society ...."] From Thomas Starkie's 1813 libel law treatise, pp. 199-200 (some paragraph breaks added): Were every malicious and oppressive act to be considered illegal, the law would be very agreeable to the theorist, but utterly unfit for the practical purposes of society, on account of the infinite perplexity and uncertainty which would occur in distinguishing between bad and good motives, where the act done might arise from either source. The secret purpose of a man's heart is of too difficult ascertainment to be made the general criterion of legal right or wrong; and hence it is that the law, which must resort to more plain and certain evidence, on which it may found more precise prescriptions, may not unfrequently become the instrument of oppression. For example: where a creditor, from motives of malice and revenge, and net with a view to his legal remedy, deprives his…

In Massachusetts: “Attorneys – Duty to disclose – Rule 1.13(b)” — “Where a plaintiff limited liability company has alleged that a defendant attorney was negligent in not disclosing to the plaintiff’s board of directors certain information that the company’s chief executive officer shared with the attorney regarding a federal investigation, the attorney is entitled to summary judgment because he did not have and did not breach any duty to disclose directly to the board the information that was already known to its CEO.” “‘Massachusetts Premier Soccer LLC ran a for-profit youth soccer business under the name Global Premier Soccer. The parties refer to the plaintiff as ‘GPS.’ Many of GPS’s coaches were foreign nationals who were present in the United States under temporary, non-immigrant visas. During 2018, federal agents began to investigate GPS’s use of these visas for its coaches. Attorney…

In November 2024, people in Afghanistan’s northern Takhar province were met with a surprise when they tuned on the nightly television news: a blank screen. Instead of an anchor sitting at the usual desk, all they saw was Mah-e-Now channel’s logo imposed on a blue background. While a voice was reading out the headlines, there was no actual footage of the events.  This was no technical issue, but rather Mah-E-Now had been forced to comply with a new “morality law” imposed by the Taliban, barring broadcasters from showing images of living beings under the group’s harsh interpretation of sharia law. Soon, similar reports emerged from other parts of the country – from Badghis, Wardak and Kandahar. In Helmand, private TV stations were reportedly forced off the air altogether. It was the latest blow against Afghanistan’s embattled media landscape under the Taliban. Once one of the country’s few unqualified success stories, Afghan…

Ontario Wills and Estates #LawFact of the Day: Life Insurance and Your Estate #law #legal #EstatePlanningLife insurance policies that designate a beneficiary become that beneficiary's property on the day the insured dies. They don't become part of the insured’s Estate and they are not subjected to estate tax.Speak to your insurer to designate or update your beneficiary under your policy. It's a critical step in your estate planning. - Garry J. Wise, Toronto Visit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net Visit our website: www.wiselaw.net

By Tony Liu, Founder and Principal Business Trial Attorney  In Summary:  The “Big Beautiful Bill” proposes to make E-Verify, a federal employment verification system, mandatory nationwide. While designed to strengthen border security, it threatens to upend hiring practices and increase legal exposure for business owners. This article explores what business leaders need to know, including how the law could affect workforce strategy, compliance risks, and proactive steps to protect operations. If you’re relying on fast, flexible hiring or trusting your vendors and partners to do things right, you can’t afford to ignore this. Is Your Workforce Strategy at Risk? The workforce of tomorrow may not be built on speed, flexibility, or even trust—it may be built on paperwork. With the proposed “Big Beautiful Bill” inching closer to the legislative floor, business leaders with lean operations and rapid hiring needs are asking: What will…