Italian order limiting freedom of assembly sparks international backlash

A federal judge on Friday prevented the Trump administration from revoking temporary protected status for 5,000 Venezuelans – halting the invalidation of work permits and other residency documents. San Francisco U.S. District Judge Edward Chen found that Home Security Kristi Noem potentially exceeded her legal authority when trying to invalidate Temporary Protection Status (TPS)-related documents issued under the Biden administration to the Venezuelans. In April of 2024 former Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas announced an 18-month extension of the Temporary Protected Status, a program that grants temporary work authorization to individuals of certain countries deemed unsafe, allowing the current beneficiaries to re-register and maintain work authorizations until March of 2026. Shortly after the second Trump administration took over, however, Secretary Kristi Noem announced the cancellation of the TPS, calling it “against the country’s national…

As readers of this blog may be aware, I’m a big fan of the governance model known as Purpose-Driven Board Leadership (PDBL). If you’re not familiar with PDBL, it follows four basic principles: Purpose Over Organization – commitment to an organization’s mission, core values, and immutable vision (i.e., the social outcome that is the reason for the organization’s existence) above the outcome that is the best for the organization in isolation Respect for Ecosystem – commitment to decisions and actions that take into account how they may impact the organization’s (a) communities (e.g., service recipients and other beneficiaries, employees, volunteers, donors, allies, adversaries, applicable geographic communities) and (b) ecosystem (including the natural environment in which the organization operates or impacts) Equity Mindset – commitment to advancing equitable outcomes without favoritism built on…

Join Michael H. Cohen, founding attorney at Cohen Healthcare Law Group, as he discusses the crucial FDA guidelines that functional food and beverage companies must follow. The post Legal Essentials for Functional Food and Beverage Companies: Compliance and Marketing appeared first on Cohen Healthcare Law Group | Healthcare Lawyers | FDA & FTC Law.

As reported by Reuters here:  An attorney defending artificial-intelligence company Anthropic in a copyright lawsuit over music lyrics told a California federal judge on Thursday that her law firm Latham & Watkins was responsible for an incorrect footnote in an expert report caused by an AI "hallucination." Ivana Dukanovic said in a court filing that the expert had relied on a legitimate academic journal article, but Dukanovic created a citation for it using Anthropic's chatbot Claude, which made up a fake title and authors in what the attorney called "an embarrassing and unintentional mistake." Although not about AI hallucinations, Matthew Dahl in this recent paper, shows that LLMs are not very good even at technical conformance with bluebook rules:  Bye-bye, Bluebook? Automating Legal Procedure with Large Language Models Legal practice requires careful adherence to procedural rules. In the United States, few are more complex than…

[And that is the problem.] President Trump continues to shift paradigms and cause people to reconsider long-held beliefs. His latest Truth Social post has launched a thousands takes. I've already focused on Ed Whelan and the Wall Street Journal. Here, I will write about David French's column in the New York Times. David purports to explain why many Republican-appointed judges have ruled against Trump. David is not simply writing based on what he reads in judicial opinions. Rather, he suggests that he has some inside information--or at least personal insights. French writes: I come from the conservative legal movement, I have friends throughout the conservative legal movement (including many Trump-appointed judges), and I think I know the answer, or at least part of it. David is speaking, or least he purports to speak, for judges that Trump appointed during his first term. I've written that Whelan and the Wall Street Journal got the situation 100% backwards.…

On June 5, 2025, the Minerva Center for the Rule of Law under Extreme Conditions, in collaboration with the Clinical Legal Education Center and the Fried-Gal Transitional Justice Program at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, will host webinar on "Transitional Justice for Israel-Palestine in Comparative Perspective." Details are here.     

A jury charge in Texas serves a specific purpose: to instruct the jury on the law applicable to the case being tried. Article 36.14 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure outlines the procedure and requirements for a proper jury charge. It is a critical stage in the trial process that informs the jury not only about the legal standards it must use in determining the defendant’s guilt or innocence but also about the jury’s prerogative to find a lesser-included offense or accept an affirmative defense if the facts and law permit such findings. Article 36.14 and its application, as defined by the State’s jurisprudence, has carved out several basic prerequisites for a proper jury charge: It must include all the elements for the offense being tried, such as the definition of the offense (e.g., murder), the required mental state to commit the offense, and the required theories of liability (e.g., acting as principal or accomplice). The jury charge must be in…

 Pix credit here On the basis of Resolution 26/9 (2014), the Human Rights Council established an open-ended intergovernmental working group on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights. The mandate for the OEIGWG, buttressed by a cohesive and like minded group of supporters, was to elaborate an "international legally binding instrument to regulate, in international human rights law, the activities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises." This, the  OEIGWG has sought to do with great vigor, aided by a closely self-referencing group of supporters who have managed to maintain the sort of committed solidarity that may be necessary in this age to put forward a compulsory version of their vision for the rest of us. To that end, they have singlemindedly labored for more than a decade to produce a draft of something that appeals to them and their supporters. Pix credit hereThey have come…

Rephael Stern, Harvard Law School; Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, has published The Lost English Roots of Notice-and-Comment Rulemaking at 134 Yale L.J. 1955 (2025). Notice-and-comment rulemaking is arguably the most important procedure in the modern administrative state. Influential accounts even frame it as the 1946 Administrative Procedure Act's "most important idea." But its historical origins are obscure. Scholars have variously suggested that it grew out of the constitutionally sanctioned practice of congressional petitioning, organically developed from the practices of nineteenth-century agencies, or was influenced by German conceptions of administrative rulemaking. These histories, however, are incomplete. Using original archival research, this Article demonstrates that notice-and-comment rulemaking was the product of a series of American transplantations of English rulemaking procedures that developed in the late nineteenth and early…

The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) urged El Salvador Friday to repeal its newly enacted “foreign agents” law, calling it a direct threat to press freedom and civil society. The law, approved on May 20 by the Legislative Assembly dominated by President Nayib Bukele’s party, requires organizations and individuals receiving international funding to register with the Ministry of Interior and imposes a 30 percent tax on such funds. It also grants the government sweeping authority to monitor, fine, or shut down those who fail to comply. Journalists and legal experts have expressed concern that the law’s vague and broad language allows authorities to arbitrarily classify anyone receiving foreign support as a foreign agent. This could impact freelance reporters, trainers, and nonprofit workers, who risk being labeled as hostile actors simply for engaging in international partnerships. The measure has drawn sharp comparisons to authoritarian regimes,…

In the case of Neubauer v. Piercy, 2025 IL App (2d) 240357-U, the Illinois Appellate Court for the Second District affirmed the dismissal of a breach of fiduciary duty claim against a law firm on statute of limitations grounds. The court held that the two-year statute of limitations barred the claim because the plaintiffs knew or should have known of their injury more than two years before they filed suit. Plaintiffs sued the Defendant law firm for breach of fiduciary duty. Rodney Piercy founded Piercy & Associates, an estate planning law firm. In 2014, Rodney Piercy and his son, Matthew, formed an investment firm known as Family Wealthy Legacy. Matthew was principally responsible for managing the investments of the company. In 2018, plaintiffs invested $1.4 million in Family Wealth Management.  Plaintiffs were essentially alleging that Rodney breached his fiduciary duty to them by failing to disclose to them in 2018 that his son was likely a fraud and crook. The…

While Colombia has made notable progress in protecting the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and gender-diverse (LGBT) individuals, the country must urgently address widespread discrimination and violence still faced by these communities, a UN human rights expert has warned Friday. Graeme Reid, the UN Independent Expert on protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, concluded a fact-finding mission across multiple Colombian cities. In his statement, Reid praised the government’s commitment to equality and its legal reforms, but emphasized the stark disconnect between institutional progress and the daily lived experiences of LGBT individuals. “Despite these positive developments, many LGBT people continue to experience discrimination and violence in their daily lives,” Reid said. “This is particularly acute for trans women and for those who face intersecting forms of marginalization as…

In 2013, with an increasing number of wrongful convictions—many of which were based on flawed forensic evidence (“junk science“) such as disproven arson investigation techniques, bite mark analysis, misapplied bloodstain pattern analysis, and shaking baby syndrome—the Texas Legislature enacted the first legal pathway for an inmate to challenge their conviction when new or advanced science discredited the evidence used to convict. This pathway was created through the codification of Article 11.073 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. This new law was primarily driven by the case of Michael Morton, who was wrongfully convicted due to misinterpreted forensic evidence and blatant prosecutorial misconduct. Morton spent 25 years in prison for the murder of his wife and was later exonerated through DNA evidence. The law thus had one basic purpose: to “accommodate evolving science“ and provide a meaningful pathway to overturn convictions based…

Referring to King George III of Britain, this nation’s Declaration of Independence said:  “A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of free people.” President Donald J. Trump has always viewed the American presidency as an inherent, king-like right to rule over the people of the United States, as though it were his personal fiefdom. This attitude led to him being impeached twice during his first term in office, charged with a total of 88 criminal offenses after leaving the White House, convicted of 34 of those offenses, and found civilly liable for 88 million dollars for engaging in forced sex offenses and defamation. Throughout his run for, and during his actual presidency, Trump has either fomented or gave credence to a laundry list of “Deep State” conspiracy theories popular with what has been dubbed as his “MAGA base”—a political coalition of violent white…

When you seek medical care, you trust that your healthcare providers will work together to give you safe, coordinated treatment. However, many patients in Pennsylvania experience harm due to disjointed, fragmented care — where critical communication between providers breaks down. In these cases, patients may suffer serious consequences like delayed diagnosis, medication errors, or worsening conditions. If you’ve been affected by poor care coordination, you may have legal grounds to file a medical malpractice lawsuit. Under Pennsylvania law, a lack of continuity of care can be considered negligence if it results in harm. This article explores how such claims work, what evidence is needed, and how to take legal action.   What Is Continuity of Care? A Definition in Healthcare Terms Continuity of care means that a patient’s treatment is consistent and well-coordinated across different healthcare settings and providers. Ideally, your primary care doctor,…

The US Department of Education (DOE) announced Friday that New York state has violated federal civil rights law by banning Native American school mascots while permitting mascots derived from other ethnic groups. This comes after the DOE launched an investigation into the state’s mascot controversy last month. The investigation was launched after The Native American Guardians Association (NAGA) filed a complaint with the DOE’s Office of Civil Rights (OCR), alleging that the New York Department of Education (NYDOE) and the New York Board of Regents (BOR) are violating federal civil rights law by forcing the Massapequa School District to eliminate its “Chiefs” mascot based on its association with Native American culture. In 2023 the BOR voted unanimously to adopt a NYDOE regulation that prohibits the use of Indigenous team names, mascots, and logos by public schools. Four Long Island school districts filed a federal lawsuit challenging the regulation,…

[Do Congress and the courts have adequate tools to rein in Trump’s scattershot use of executive power?] [This is a guest blog from a friend and colleague, Abner S. Greene, who is the Leonard F. Manning Professor at Fordham Law School and has been following the constitutional separation-of-powers issues at the heart of many of the current cases involving the scope of President Trump's powers for many years.] Donald Trump's aggressive use of executive power in his second term threatens to upset the balance of power between President and Congress, and although courts have pushed back against Trump's excesses,[i] up-front hurdles and back-end limits render courts an imperfect check.  In this essay I will describe an argument I made 30 years ago about the problem of expanded presidential power, explain the hurdles facing my suggestions for a better balance of executive-legislative power, discuss the limits of congressional power to check an unhinged…

“Lawyers for Migrants Press Appeals Court to Stop Trump’s Use of Alien Enemies Act; It was an opening salvo in what is likely to be the decisive legal battle over the president’s attempts to employ the rarely used wartime law as a centerpiece of his aggressive deportation agenda”: Alan Feuer of The New York Times has this report. You can access the brief for appellants filed yesterday in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit via this link.