PFAS Lawsuit 2025 Update: Marin, Barrett, and Murphy Secures $11M in Water Contamination Settlements – Claim Your Compensation for Kidney Cancer, Testicular Cancer & More Now

The romance between Texas bankruptcy judge David R. Jones and Biglaw partner Elizabeth Freeman has birthed some intense controversy that remains ongoing. See, Jones, the (now former) federal bankruptcy judge, somehow didn’t recuse himself from cases involving Freeman, the (now former) partner at Jackson Walker. As a result, Jones resigned and the Department of Justice sued Freeman’s former firm to try to disgorge up to $23 million in fees it collected in the 33 cases overseen by Jones while he was involved with Freeman and alleging the firm breached its ethical duties by not disclosing the relationship. Jackson Walker insists it acted properly upon learning of the relationship. Now it looks like that case is headed to trial. Jackson Walker and the US Trustee’s office were in mediation in an attempt to resolve the matter. Yesterday, July 15th at 5 p.m., was the deadline Judge Alia Moses imposed on the mediation attempt.…

Trusted Content Legally Reviewed by: Christopher J. Baione Key Takeaways Scientific research has shown a connection between exposure to toxic dust and debris from the September 11th attacks and the development of autoimmune diseases. A 2015 study identified rheumatoid arthritis as the most common autoimmune condition among those exposed, accounting for 37% of cases.  A 2019 study published in Arthritis & Rheumatology confirmed these findings and included both first responders and members of the general community. No. However, scientific research has shown a connection between exposure to toxic dust and debris from the September 11th attacks and the development of autoimmune diseases. A 2015 study identified rheumatoid arthritis as the most common autoimmune condition among those exposed,…

Matthew A. Shapiro (Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Rutgers Law School) has posted Civil Procedure's Partial Rule of Law on SSRN. Here is the abstract: With the rule of law widely thought to be experiencing a “crisis,” the institution of civil litigation has come under renewed scrutiny. Recent developments have led some commentators to portray litigation as not just a victim, but an agent, of the rule-of-law crisis. At the same time, even as some notable instances of litigation appear to have threatened the rule of law, others have seemingly vindicated it, reinforcing a longstanding association between the institution and the ideal. This Article seeks to account for civil litigation’s ambiguous relationship with the rule of law. The ambiguity, this Article contends, owes to a more fundamental, yet underappreciated, equivocation in our understandings of both litigation and the rule of law regarding the commitment to impartiality in law…

A felony theft charge in California involves unlawfully taking someone else’s property valued over $950 or stealing certain items like firearms or vehicles, regardless of their value. It is considered a serious crime and can lead to jail or prison time, fines, and a permanent criminal record. If you are facing a felony theft charge, a skilled California theft crimes attorney can protect your rights and fight for the best possible outcome. They can examine the evidence, challenge illegal searches or weak witness claims, and argue that you lacked criminal intent or had permission to take the property. An experienced lawyer may also negotiate to reduce the charge to a misdemeanor or seek alternatives to jail. With the right defense, you have a better chance of protecting your freedom and future. Get A Free Consultation Elements of a Felony Theft Charge in California In California, felony theft is a serious crime that can lead to jail or prison time, fines, and a permanent…

 Pix Credit here Latin America is as varied as its peoples. What they appear to share in common is adaptation to the substantial changes in the forms, cultures, and cognitive cages within which the United States seeks to deal with its Hispano-Lusitanian-Indigenous neighbors. Senator Henry ClayThat very American cognitive cage, sometimes referenced as America(s) First, posits a normative triumph of the transactional. That is, it returns the United States to a political-cultural position closer to that of the middle of the 19th century--markets driven, trading focused, and grounded on the notion that the State served the nation best as a large and multi-purpose Import-Export Bank and insurance enterprise, one that included a military wing for the protection of a trading environment centered in the nation but extending outward through investment transactions and transactions in goods and services, that serves the nation by creating wealth. Americans (at least the…

Turning Insight Into Impact Ever watched a legal webinar and thought, “I could do that”? Yes, you can! In our previous post, we explored why becoming a webinar speaker is a smart move for legal professionals looking to elevate their careers. This follow-up dives into what comes next: how to step into the speaker role with confidence and clarity. If you’ve built experience in your field and want to connect with peers, increase your visibility, earn CLE credit, and position yourself as a thought leader, leading a webinar might be your next big move. It doesn’t require flashy presentation skills, just a clear message, thoughtful preparation, and a willingness to engage. With the right topic and approach, you can turn your legal knowledge into a presentation that informs, inspires, and strengthens your presence in the legal community. How To Get Started as a Webinar Speaker Becoming a webinar speaker can seem overwhelming, but with a few key steps, you can…

Immigration Matters is a recurring series by César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández that analyzes the court’s immigration docket, highlighting emerging legal questions about new policy and enforcement practices. Please note that the views of outside contributors do not reflect the official opinions of SCOTUSblog or its staff. After returning to the White House with a promise to remake immigration policy, President Donald Trump tapped the Supreme Court’s emergency docket with remarkable success this term. During the administration’s first six months, the justices have sided with the federal government, to some extent, in almost every immigration case that has appeared on its fast-track calendar. Characterized by its fast pace and limited briefing, the court’s emergency docket quickly became a centerpiece of the Trump administration’s legal strategy on immigration. Having promised to oversee mass deportations, the…

The flu shot can cause a variety of side effects. It is also known to cause serious complications in a small percentage of cases. When flu shot recipients experience serious complications, they (or their families) will often be eligible to file claims under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). Learn more from national vaccination attorney Leah V. Durant: Common Side Effects of the Annual Flu Shot Like all vaccines, the annual flu shot has a list of common side effects. As the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) explain, “[f]or the most part these are minor . . . and go away within a few days.” As identified by the CDC, common side effects of the flu shot include: Soreness, redness and swelling at the injection site Fever Muscle aches Headaches Generally speaking, these side effects are to be expected, and they do not provide grounds to file a claim under the VICP. It is when the unintended effects of a flu shot…

By Angelo L. Rosa | Managing Partner at ROSA PLLC & President at ALR Publications Ltd. This article is an overview of the anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) law, which has been newly codified as part of Idaho law in the “Uniform Public Expression Protection Act” codified at Idaho Code § 6-3901, et seq. and taking effect January 1, 2026. Having practiced primarily in California and Idaho (one with a highly advanced and inclusive body of statutory and case law on this matter and the other just beginning its journey), the author will describe (at a high level) the purpose of an anti-SLAPP statutory scheme, what it is meant to protect, the abuses that have become common across jurisdictions with such schemes, and some specific warnings given Idaho’s current state of legal evolution. A Summarized Education in Anti-SLAPP Law An anti-SLAPP statute is meant to address the rise of meritless lawsuits whose intent is to chill the valid…

Lawdragon has selected four Seeger Weiss attorneys – Steven Daroci, Max Kelly, Caleb Seeley, and Frazar Thomas – in the 2025 Lawdragon 500 X – The Next Generation guide. This honor celebrates rising stars of the legal profession who are shaping the future of law through their talent, dedication, and groundbreaking work across a range of practice areas. Honorees are typically within 15 years of graduating law school and are selected through a rigorous process involving submissions, independent journalistic research, and peer review. These attorneys are recognized for their impactful work in complex litigation, including product liability and class actions. Their leadership and achievements reflect Seeger Weiss’s ongoing commitment to justice and excellence in plaintiff-side advocacy. The selection methodology can be found here. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. Prior results do not guarantee or…

Allegations of fraud in post-divorce disputes can raise high-stakes questions about fairness, financial rights, and the enforceability of settlement agreements. However, while dissatisfaction with the terms of a divorce may lead one party to challenge a signed agreement, New York law sets a demanding legal standard for setting aside such contracts. A recent ruling from a New York court sheds light on how courts evaluate claims of fraudulent inducement, particularly when the stipulation language directly contradicts the allegations. If you are facing a legal battle over a marital settlement, it is in your best interest to contact a New York divorce attorney as soon as possible. Facts of the Case It is alleged that the parties married in 2004 and later divorced following the wife’s filing for divorce in January 2019. During the course of their marriage, they resided in a home in Westhampton Beach. The parties did not have children. The divorce action was resolved by a…

Like proper Jerry Bruckheimer action stars, David Esseks and Eugene Ingoglia just walked out of A&O Shearman leaving explosions in their wake. Esseks, A&O Shearman’s co-head of investigations & white-collar, will join Ingoglia in a new litigation outfit, Essecks Ingoglia. As the American Lawyer notes: Esseks and Ingoglia are the latest partners to leave A&O Shearman, which has experienced fairly consistent departures since the firm’s merger took effect in May 2024. Many, but not all, of these are likely to be connected to the firm’s plans, reported on by Law.com in September 2024, to cut 10% of its equity partnership. Yeah, that’s one theory. The merger of Allen & Overy and Shearman & Sterling brought a lot of collateral damage, with a promised 10 percent cut to the equity partner ranks and some 59 partners departing since then. But that’s been cooking since late last year and the firm’s co-head of…

Buying or selling real estate is a major financial decision, and having a clear, comprehensive purchase agreement is one of the most critical parts of the process. Whether you’re a first-time homebuyer, a seasoned investor, or someone selling a property, the real estate purchase agreement protects your interests. Continue reading and reach out to the seasoned Florida real estate attorneys here at Ansbacher Law to learn more about what you should include in a real estate purchase agreement. 11 Things to Include in a Real Estate Purchase Agreement Below is a detailed list of what you should expect to see in a properly executed real estate purchase agreement: Legal Names of All Parties: The contract must clearly identify the buyer and the seller using their full legal names. If a corporation, trust, or partnership is involved, the entity’s legal name should be used. Accuracy here is critical, as even minor mistakes can cause complications down the road. Property…

This week, Congressional Republicans will make the first move in the next major battle in Congress this year — the upcoming government funding deadline on Sept. 30 — and they appear poised to instigate a government shutdown. As reporters cover Republicans’ actions, it’s critical to understand their motivations and what the consequences will be for the American people beyond those implicated by the program cuts in the rescissions bill itself. Congress can’t reach bipartisan deals if Republicans can unilaterally change them at any time Congressional Republicans will march the country right into a full government shutdown if they refuse to stand by bipartisan funding agreements. For months already, Congressional Republicans have aided and abetted the Administration’s illegal and unconstitutional actions to withhold money for programs that serve the American people. Since Day One, the Administration has been executing a government…

When the election of the liberal justice Janet Protasiewicz flipped the balance of the Wisconsin Supreme Court in 2023, liberal groups responded immediately. A lawsuit was filed the day after she joined the court, which led to the new liberal majority barring further use of the existing state assembly and senate districts. Those maps had been crafted by Republican legislators and redounded greatly to their benefit. In 2022, the Democratic Governor Tony Evers won reelection with 51.1% of the vote, yet he only carried a majority in 39 of 99 Assembly and 13 of 33 Senate seats. For fear of the Court imposing an even worse map (for them), Republican legislators responded by passing a map drawn by Evers. Evers accepted this compromise; although it was opposed by almost all state legislators from his own party. The results of this new map were on full display in November 2024. Harris lost the state with 48.7% of the vote, but she still carried a majority of the vote in 49 of 99…

A San Joaquin Valley operation administered by BLM’s Bakersfield office. Photo: BLMA court fight over oil drilling off the coast of Refugio State Beach near Santa Barbara. Proposals to drill around public schools in Ojai and Los Osos. The potential for oil operations directly adjacent to popular national monuments. New risks to our ecosystems that sustain imperiled species like the California condor. This is what “Drill, Baby, Drill” looks like so far in California and action is coming this week. Welcome to The Drain, a weekly roundup of environmental and climate news. Subscribe to the newsletter here.  Even if you’ve seen the headlines, heard the talking points, and fielded urgent NGO fundraising appeals for months about how the Trump administration plans to open public lands for oil drilling, it still hits different when it comes for your region. Now, the Trump administration is reviving plans to expand oil drilling and fracking across more…

Construction projects rarely go exactly as planned. Delays, scope changes, and unexpected conditions often lead to changes in the original agreement. But how those changes are handled can make or break a project. In Florida construction law, there’s a clear difference between a change order and a contract modification, and knowing the difference is critical […]

  You’re frustrated. You’re owed money. The other side won’t return your calls. It’s tempting to sue right away, but hold on. In many Florida commercial cases, sending a demand letter first can save you time and money. When done right, it puts pressure on the other side to take the action you want. When done wrong, it can weaken your position from the start. What Is a Demand Letter? A demand letter is a formal notice telling the other party what you want and why. It usually asks for payment or action by a specific date. This gives them a chance to fix the issue before you go to court. It also shows that you tried to settle things first. A good demand letter gets attention. It can push the other side to pay or respond without a fight. In some cases, it helps protect your right to collect attorney’s fees later. It also lays out your side of the story clearly and in writing in the event the case does end up in court. If your demand letter is…