[Ilya Somin] The Case Against Judicial Deference to Executive Branch "Factual" Determinations in Alien Enemies Act Cases

Hammersmith & Fulham Law Centre Housing Solicitor/ Caseworker Salary: £34,000 – £50,000 (depending on experience) Working hours: 35 per week, Hybrid working Contract: Permanent Benefits include 30 days annual leave plus bank holidays, compressed hours 4 day working week and flexible working. Our offices in Hammersmith are on the Piccadilly, District and Hammersmith & City Line tubes. We require a solicitor or caseworker for our small, friendly housing team. We are looking for someone who meets the LAA supervisor standard, although applications will be considered from those who do not meet the standard. The successful candidate will run their own caseload of legal help and certificated cases for clients and will participate in the HLPAS Scheme. Hammersmith & Fulham Law Centre is an equal opportunities employer and encourages applications from all candidates who meet the person specification regardless of age, religion, gender, sexual orientation,…

When you’re facing sex crime charges in New Jersey, the attorney you choose can make or break your case. And while any licensed criminal defense attorney can technically represent you, hiring someone who is local to Jersey City—and deeply familiar with Hudson County courts—offers a level of insight, access, and strategy that outsiders simply can’t match. Here’s why choosing a local jersey city sex crime law firm isn’t just a convenience—it’s a critical advantage. 1. Familiarity with Local Courts and Prosecutors Every courthouse has its own rhythms, procedures, and personalities. A local sex crime defense lawyer understands: How Hudson County judges typically rule on motions and sentencing Which prosecutors are more likely to negotiate versus push for trial The informal rules and preferences that aren’t written down but influence every case This kind of familiarity allows a local attorney to anticipate challenges, prepare…

As the work landscape continues to evolve after the COVID-19 pandemic, one issue that continues to surface for Ontario employees is the question of remote work reversals. Employers that permitted or even encouraged remote work during the pandemic are now calling workers back to the office after several years away. But in a post-pandemic world where remote work has become the norm for many, can your employer force you to return? This blog explores the legal and practical implications of returning to the office in Ontario, focusing on employees’ rights and obligations under employment law, the enforceability of return-to-office mandates, and potential legal recourse for employees affected by a reversal of remote work policies. The Rise and Reversal of Remote Work The shift to remote work in early 2020 was unprecedented, driven by public health imperatives rather than long-term planning. Many Ontario employers quickly adapted, and numerous employees embraced the flexibility,…

A tragic single-vehicle accident in Sebastopol has claimed the life of a driver after their Nissan crossed into oncoming traffic and struck a tree along Bloomfield Road. The incident, which occurred at approximately 4:04 p.m., serves as a sobering reminder of how quickly roadway accidents can turn fatal and the complex legal questions that often arise in their aftermath. Details of the Sebastopol Fatal Crash According to the California Highway Patrol (CHP), preliminary investigations reveal that the Nissan was traveling southbound on Bloomfield Road when it suddenly crossed the northbound lane. The vehicle continued onto the shoulder before colliding with a tree. The driver was immediately transported to Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital with life-threatening injuries but was later pronounced dead despite medical efforts. The cause of this fatal crash remains under active investigation by the CHP, with authorities working to determine what factors may have contributed to the vehicle…

Surrogacy can be a beautiful path to parenthood, but it also comes with intricate legal challenges, especially when undertaken overseas. In a recent and cautionary case from Queensland, Australia, a couple’s journey to parenthood through commercial surrogacy in North Cyprus ended not with joy alone, but with legal turmoil and potential criminal charges. This video unpacks the complexities of the Lloyd and Compton case, highlighting critical lessons for anyone considering surrogacy abroad. Drawing on decades of experience advising over 2,000 surrogacy journeys worldwide, Stephen Page from Page Provan Family and Fertility Lawyers sheds light on the pitfalls of overseas commercial surrogacy and the importance of expert legal guidance. The Lloyd and Compton Case: A Surrogacy Journey Gone Wrong The case of Lloyd and Compton, decided by the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia in January, involved a Queensland couple who sought surrogacy services in North Cyprus.…

Dentons has become the first large law firm in Australia to announce they have achieved a 0% median gender gay gap, after just completing the Workplace Gender Equality Agency (WGEA) Compliance reporti

When parents part ways, establishing clear custody agreements becomes a significant task. These agreements not only set the groundwork for each parent’s legal responsibilities but also provide stability and assurance for children involved. Without a clear plan, misunderstandings and conflicts can arise, causing stress for everyone. A well-thought-out custody agreement can help reduce these issues, ensuring that both the children’s and parents’ needs are met satisfactorily. Clear custody agreements offer guidelines on important matters such as visitation rights, holiday schedules, and parental responsibilities. They help to avoid confusion and create a structured environment where children can thrive. By taking the time to develop a comprehensive agreement, parents can ensure smoother transitions and more peaceful co-parenting experiences. It’s like setting up the rules for a game; everyone knows what to expect, which makes for a more enjoyable and…

Medical malpractice cases are inherently complex, often involving intricate medical evidence and legal principles. One of the most critical aspects of medical malpractice in Pennsylvania is comparative negligence. Understanding how comparative negligence influences compensation and liability in medical malpractice cases is crucial for both patients and healthcare providers. In Pennsylvania, the law recognizes that sometimes, both the patient and the healthcare provider may share fault in causing an injury. This article will explore the nuances of comparative negligence in Pennsylvania medical malpractice cases, including how fault is determined, how damages are calculated, and how both patients and healthcare professionals can protect their interests.   What is Comparative Negligence? Definition of Comparative Negligence Comparative negligence is a legal doctrine that allows for the allocation of fault when more than one party is responsible for an injury. In medical…

On May 14, 2025, Lee Zeldin, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator, announced the agency will retain its current National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for two of the most studied per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS). With this announcement, the agency provided a roadmap as to its intention to continue protecting public health from these so called “forever chemicals” while introducing new regulatory flexibility aimed at the compliance burden for drinking water systems, particularly small and rural water systems. While some have mischaracterized this as a roll back from what the Biden Administration had announced, most in the environmental industrial complex have commended the agency for balancing science based health protections with regulatory pragmatism. The EPA’s decision reflects a reprioritized agency commitment to safeguarding drinking water, honoring the…

Ward Law Office LLC | Registered Patent Attorneys is pleased to announce that Fernando Alberdi, Ph.D. has joined the firm as a Managing Attorney.“We are thrilled to welcome Dr. Alberdi to Ward Law Office LLC as a Managing Attorney,” said Jake Ward, Founding Member. “His exceptional expertise in life sciences intellectual property and proven track record counseling both public and private sector clients will be invaluable as we expand our intellectual property practice. Fernando’s unique combination of scientific and legal acumen positions us perfectly to serve the growing needs of our clients in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors.” Dr. Alberdi focuses his practice on patent preparation and prosecution in life science, chemical, biopharmaceutical and biotechnological arts. He counsels public and private companies as well as non-profit institutions including hospitals, research institutions and universities on the full spectrum of…

[While there is no constitutional right to receive grants, the Constitution does bar grant conditions that undermine constitutional rights.] (Photo 181642336 © Zimmytws | Dreamstime.com)The Trump Administration has been trying to leverage federal grants in ways that force various people and organizations to give up their constitutional rights or submit to constraints that go beyond the constitutional authority of the federal government. A standard response to criticisms of such policies that people have no right to these grants in the first place. Receiving federal grants and other government benefits, it is said, is a "privilege, not a right." Thus, the federal government can impose whatever conditions it wants on recipients. In an excellent recent Washington Post article, University of Pennsylvania law Prof. Mitchell Berman has a great explanation of why such reasoning is badly wrong: Universities refuse to fully dismantle their DEI programs? The Trump…

Being accused of a sex crime is a life-altering event. In New Jersey, these charges carry serious legal penalties and lasting social consequences. Whether the allegation stems from a misunderstanding, mistaken identity, or false accusation, your next steps are critical to your future. Here’s a practical guide on what to do if you’re facing a sex crime allegation in New Jersey. 1. Do Not Attempt to Explain Yourself to Police One of the biggest mistakes people make after being accused of a sex offense is trying to “clear things up” with law enforcement. You might believe that if you just explain your side of the story, everything will work out. Unfortunately, anything you say can and will be used against you. Even innocent-sounding statements may be misinterpreted or taken out of context later. Instead, politely invoke your right to remain silent and state that you will not speak without an attorney present. 2. Do Not Contact the Alleged Victim Even if you…

In Olsen v. State of Iowa, (IA Dist. Ct., May 22, 2025), an Iowa state trial court allowed plaintiff, a member of the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church, to move ahead with his suit seeking an injunction to bar enforcement of Iowa's controlled-substance laws against his religious use of cannabis.  The suit contends that his religious use of marijuana is protected by Iowa's Religious Freedom Restoration Act enacted last year. That Act contains its own definition of "compelling governmental interest." Even though in federal court litigation in 2008 plaintiff lost his claim that the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act exempts his religious use of marijuana from federal and state controlled-substance laws, the Iowa state court rejected the state's argument that this suit should be dismissed on collateral estoppel grounds, saying in part:The issue raised in this litigation is the same as the Petitioner’s prior actions as cited in the…

Accidents can happen anywhere, especially with young children who are naturally curious and active. At daycare, a scrape from a fall or a small bump from playtime might be expected. But what if your child’s injury goes beyond the occasional tumble? What if you suspect the injury was caused by negligence? Navigating this situation can be overwhelming for any parent, but knowing what steps to take is key to ensuring your child’s safety and well-being. At Saavedra Law Firm, we have been handling situations like this for years, and are ready to guide you. Here are the essential steps you can take if your child is injured at daycare: Get medical attention immediately.   Document the incident and injury.   Contact the daycare center’s management and preserve evidence.   Understand what constitutes daycare negligence.   Explore legal options for recovering losses or damages.   Below, we’ll walk you through each…

A tragic pedestrian-truck collision fatality occurred early Friday morning on eastbound Highway 37 in Vallejo, claiming the life of a 37-year-old Sacramento woman. The incident is a stark reminder of the dangers pedestrians face on California’s busy highways and the importance of understanding legal rights following such devastating accidents. Details of the Highway 37 Fatal Accident According to the California Highway Patrol (CHP), the fatal collision occurred at approximately 3:18 a.m. on May 23, 2025, east of the Sacramento Street overcrossing on eastbound Highway 37. Officers initially responded to reports of a pedestrian walking in the highway’s eastbound lane. However, while emergency responders were en route, they received notification that a 2017 Peterbilt tractor-trailer combination had already struck the pedestrian. The woman sustained fatal injuries and was pronounced dead at the scene. The truck driver, a 54-year-old man from San Pablo, was not injured…

Last month, the California Lawyers Association Nonprofit Organizations Committee hosted Audrey Rowe from the State of California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) to discuss updates to the FTB’s system and processes affecting tax-exempt organizations. This post captures some of the highlights. Beginning in 2024 the FTB began a major systems update to myFTB, a website that gives individuals, business representatives, and tax professionals online access to tax account information and online services. These updates have affected both the internal and external processes, including: In October 2024, a pilot program was rolled out to certain users to test functionality and features.  The FTB anticipates these online services will be ready to be rolled out to all users by January 2026. Ms. Rowe acknowledged that FTB staff is still learning the system. The FTB encourages users of the site to send feedback so it can incorporate user experiences and…

The plaintiff in this case is Nikko D’Ambrosio. He recently served time in prison for tax issues. Separately, he brought a lawsuit over the “Are We Dating the Same Guy?” Facebook group, run by Spill the Tea, “where women can empower each other and keep each other safe from toxic men.” (You can see the group here, but it appears that the group moderation has broken down, so recent posts are garbage). Abbigail Rajala made the following post about D’Ambrosio to the Chicago subboard, with 100k+ members: We met organically in Chicago two and a half months ago. Very clingy and very fast. Flaunted money very awkwardly and kept talking about how I don’t want to see his bad side, especially when he was on business calls. He came to see me yesterday and I explained how I didn’t really want to stay the night. I just wanted to spend the day together, and this was his response… [followed by screenshots with unkind remarks…

Introduction American law students learn about formalism and instrumentalism early on—although those particular terms may not be introduced explicitly in classroom discussion. Many law students hunger for “black letter law": they are looking for legal rules that can be memorized and applied to the facts in a more or less determinate (or even "mechanical") fashion. But in most law school classrooms, this hunger is not satisfied.  Instead, the discussion is likely to focus on another set of questions: What should the rule be? What is the purpose of the rule? Would the application of the rule to these facts serve its purpose? Does that rule make sense? And so on. Of course, different professors have different ideas about what makes for a good legal rule. Some emphasize good consequences—perhaps as defined by the economic concept of efficiency. Others might emphasize considerations of fairness or distributive justice.  Many are progressive…