Multi-Vehicle Collision on I-80 in Vallejo Leaves Pedestrian Injured

Introduction One of the most famous distinctions in contemporary legal theory was made popular by Guido Calabresi & A. Douglas Melamed's famous article, Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral.  The core idea is simple.  Legal rules that create private causes of actions (or claims for relief) can be sorted into two kinds.  Kind one consists of rules that entitle the claimant to an injunction.  Kind two consists of rules that entitle the claimant to damages.  The first kind of rule is associated with property rights--hence, we can call the first kind "property rules."  The second kind of rule is associated with tort liability or contractual liability--hence, we can call the second kind "liability rules.  The distinction between property rules and liability rules is important, because injunctions and damages have different effects on future behavior and on negotiated settlements to…

The Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University, located just outside of New York City in White Plains, New York, expects to hire one or more full-time tenure-track professors to join our faculty beginning in the 2025-26 academic year. We are hiring in environmental law, with a particular interest in candidates whose focus is on sustainable business or energy law, but we will consider exceptional candidates in all subjects. We seek candidates with valuable professional or scholarly experience, a distinguished academic record, and a record of, or great potential for, exemplary teaching and scholarly achievement.  Part of Pace University, a private university with campuses in Manhattan and Westchester County, the Elisabeth Haub School of Law is centrally located within the New York metropolitan area.  Haub Law is home to the New York State Judicial Institute, seven clinics, an extensive externship program, and an engaged faculty, making the school a central part of…

His obituary from The Boston Globe is here: FALLON, Richard "Dick" Henry Jr. Beloved husband, father, grandfather, brother, uncle, friend and Story Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, passed away on July 13, 2025. He faced his sudden illness with dignity, courage, and his signature blend of intellect, humility, and love. . . . A leading constitutional scholar and gifted teacher, Dick authored numerous landmark books and articles and was twice honored with the Sacks-Freund Award for Teaching Excellence. His professional legacy is defined by the rare combination of a once-in-a-generation intellect and scholarship with deep gentleness, wit, and unwavering devotion to his students, colleagues, and the Harvard community. . . In his final days, Dick dictated a sketch for a memoir that concluded: "I feel lucky in nearly every respect, especially including my family… I could not have done better if I had been permitted to choose."May his memory be a…

In numerous public statements, Trump Administration officials have said the Administration intends to use the False Claims Act (FCA) to enforce certain policy priorities. For example, in connection with statements concerning the Administration’s intent to combat “illegal DEI,” officials have declared that corporate DEI policies or practices violating anti-discrimination laws could trigger FCA liability.  There are a number of levels on which potential FCA liability represents a serious corporate liability risk, not least because of the possibility of whistleblowers (including company employees or competitors) launching FCA whistleblower claims. In addition, as discussed below, a recent Southern District of New York ruling highlights how potentially massive FCA liability can be. Background The FCA provides that anyone who knowingly submits a false claim for payment to the federal government can be liable for significant criminal or civil…

This just in: The University of Georgia School of Law invites applications to fill one or more tenure-track or tenured positions at the rank of assistant professor, associate professor, or professor. The positions will begin August 2026, with a possibility of a January 1, 2027 start date. Applicants must be committed to producing world-class scholarship, providing first-rate legal training, and engaging in meaningful service. Curricular priorities include property, contracts, torts, environmental law, and bankruptcy and secured transactions. Other specific curricular interests include international, administrative, banking, business and employment law. Candidates who can teach in more than one of the above-listed disciplines will be especially helpful. For more information and to apply, click here.

If you refused the breathalyzer test after being pulled over on suspicion of drunk driving, you may wonder whether that decision will prevent driving under the influence (DUI) charges. Unfortunately, the answer is no. Prosecutors can still charge you with DUI even if you decline chemical testing. As of July 2025, Illinois law allows DUI cases to move forward based on officer observations, field sobriety tests, and other evidence, even without a breath test result. If you were arrested and refused the breathalyzer, you still need a strong legal defense to protect your rights and driving privileges. Speak with a Cook County, IL criminal defense lawyer to understand your options. How Can I Be Charged With DUI Without a BAC Result? In Illinois, you can be charged with DUI in two main ways. The first is by showing that your blood alcohol concentration (BAC) was 0.08 percent or more, which typically requires a breath, blood, or urine test. But the second way does not rely on chemical…

In an age of smartphones and social media, recording conversations or encounters may seem routine. However, Texas law has strict rules about when recordings are allowed. Violating these rules can result in serious criminal charges, and understanding when it is legal to record someone is essential to avoid criminal consequences. If you are facing charges for recording someone without their consent, contact a Decatur, TX criminal defense lawyer who can review your case and advise you on how to proceed. Is It Illegal to Record Someone Without Their Consent in Texas? Texas is a "one-party consent" state. This means that under Texas Penal Code Section 16.02, it is generally legal to record a conversation if at least one party involved consents to the recording. In other words, if you are part of the conversation, you do not need to inform the other person that you are recording.

If you're on probation in Illinois and facing allegations of a violation, the stakes are high, potentially leading to revocation and serving your original sentence. At Zaremba Law Office, serving Will County, Joliet, and surrounding areas, we're dedicated to defending clients against probation violations and protecting their freedom. With over 20 years of legal experience, Jack L. Zaremba specializes in criminal defense, helping navigate these complex cases to achieve the best possible outcomes. This blog post explores probation violations in Illinois, common causes, penalties, and defense options. What Constitutes a Probation Violation in Illinois? Probation in Illinois is a court-ordered alternative to incarceration, requiring compliance with specific conditions like regular check-ins, drug testing, community service, or avoiding new offenses. A violation occurs when you fail to meet these terms, such as missing a meeting with your probation officer, failing a drug…

Juveniles are often charged with crimes such as theft, vandalism, drug possession, and assault. These offenses can lead to serious consequences even at a young age. When a juvenile is stopped by police, they have important rights, including the right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present during questioning. Police must also inform the juvenile of these rights before any interrogation. Understanding and exercising these rights is vital to protect the minor from self-incrimination. A juvenile defense attorney plays a key role by explaining these rights, investigating the case, and ensuring that the juvenile is treated fairly. The attorney can challenge improper evidence, negotiate for reduced charges, and advocate for alternatives focused on rehabilitation rather than punishment. Having skilled legal help can make a significant difference in protecting the juvenile’s future and achieving the best possible outcome in their case. Get A Free Consultation…

The Trump Administration has shown great interest in using artificial intelligence tools in governance. It has reportedly used AI to, among other things, evaluate federal workers’ responses to the government-wide “Fork in the Road” email, “munch” agency contracts it viewed as nonessential, and assist General Services Administration staff—and it plans to “accelerate” AI usage across the government. That could include using AI to aid in the rulemaking process. Indeed, shortly after the 2024 election, Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy proposed using AI to identify regulations for rescission as part of “the DOGE plan to reform government.” Agencies could conceivably use AI at numerous points in the rulemaking process, raising a host of legal and policy questions. AI tools of various stripes could be used to identify subjects for rulemaking or regulations in need of revision or elaboration. Machine learning tools could aid…

A tragic motorcycle accident in Modesto claimed the life of a Riverbank man on Friday evening, July 18th, underscoring the ongoing safety concerns surrounding motorcycle-vehicle collisions at intersections. The fatal crash occurred at the junction of Claus Road and Milnes Road around 11:00 p.m., involving a motorcycle traveling northbound and a pickup truck making a left turn. Details of the Modesto Motorcycle Accident Crash According to the Modesto Police Department, the motorcyclist was riding north on Claus Road when a southbound pickup truck attempted to turn left onto Milnes Road. The turning vehicle struck the motorcycle, causing severe injuries to the rider. Despite being rushed to a local hospital for emergency medical treatment, the motorcyclist succumbed to his injuries. The pickup truck driver remained at the scene following the collision and fully cooperated with the ongoing police investigation. No charges have been announced as authorities continue examining the…

Getting arrested or charged with a crime is scary—and for good reason. Even if the charges seem minor or you think the case will blow over, the effects can last far beyond the courtroom. A criminal record can change your life in ways most people don’t expect. Whether you’ve been charged with a misdemeanor or a felony, understanding the long-term consequences is key. In this article, we’ll explore how criminal charges can affect your future and why working with an experienced criminal defense attorney Jersey City is one of the smartest decisions you can make. 1. Employment Opportunities One of the biggest ways a criminal charge can impact your future is through your ability to get a job. Many employers run background checks before hiring. If they see a criminal conviction—especially for theft, violence, or drug-related crimes—they may reject your application, even if you’re qualified. Even if you already have a job, certain charges could…

A tragic motorcycle accident on Highway 99 in Sacramento County early Thursday morning has claimed the life of one motorcyclist, serving as a stark reminder of the dangers faced by motorcycle riders on California’s busy highways. The incident, which occurred around 1 a.m. on northbound Highway 99 south of 12th Avenue, involved a motorcyclist who lost control and collided with the rear of a red Acura RSX. Details of the Highway 99 Motorcycle Crash According to the California Highway Patrol (CHP), the motorcyclist was traveling northbound when they lost control of their vehicle and struck the back of the Acura. The impact was severe enough to eject the rider from their motorcycle, while the unmanned bike continued across multiple lanes of traffic. Despite emergency response efforts, the motorcyclist succumbed to their injuries at the scene. The identity of the deceased motorcyclist has not yet been released by authorities, pending notification of family members. CHP…

Painting of Nipper by Francis Barraud (1898-99); subsequently used as a trademark with “HIs Master’s Voice.” Lehrman v. Lovo, Inc. On July 10, 2025, the federal district court for the Southern District of New York issued an Order granting in part and denying in part a motion to dismiss a putative class action lawsuit that Paul Lehrman and Linnea Sage commenced against Lovo, Inc. The lawsuit, Lehrman v. Lovo, Inc., alleges that Lovo used artificial intelligence to make and sell unauthorized “clones” of their voices. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the plaintiffs are voice-over actors. For a fee, they read and record scripts for their clients. Lovo allegedly sells a text-to-speech subscription service that allows clients to generate voice-over narrations. The service is described as one that uses “AI-driven software known as ‘Generator’ or ‘Genny,'” which was “created using ‘1000s of…

Predrag Dojcinovic, University of Connecticut, Gladstein Family Human Rights Institute; International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (1998-2017), has published War Crimes: Definition, History, Practice. Here is the abstract. This encyclopedic entry on war crimes provides insights into their definition, historical development, and application in major international criminal trials. As some of the gravest offenses under international law, war crimes involve serious violations of international humanitarian law committed during armed conflict. Defined in Article 8 of the 1998 Rome Statute, they include targeting civilians, torture, and using child soldiers. Rooted in ancient norms and shaped by Grotius, the Lieber Code, and the Hague Conventions, the concept evolved significantly through the 1949 Geneva Conventions and the 1977 Additional Protocols (APs), which extended protections to civilians and non-international conflicts. Enforcement by tribunals like Nuremberg,…

[Part I is available here.] In the first part of this post, we explored the history of section 706, and why it probably does not support universal remedies. But even so, several Justices have hinted at their hesitation to read vacatur out of the APA. This will force the Court to contend with the second hurdle that vacatur must leap before it fills the shoes of the nationwide injunction, and the one we deal with in our own article. Is vacatur constitutional? Start with the basic definition of judicial power — “the power to render judgments in individual cases.” A corollary of this power, as well as a traditional principle of equity, is that the court’s power acts upon parties at suit, not upon the whole world and least of all upon the law itself.  This dictum was nicely summed up in Frothingham v. Mellon, where the court recognized that when it reviews a statute, it acts “not [upon] the execution of the statute, but the acts of the…

If your E-2 visa was denied due to source of funds issues, you’re not alone and we’ve successfully helped many applicants turn that denial into an approval. This is one of the most frequent reasons E-2 visas are refused, usually because the consular officer determined that the investment funds were not clearly documented or lawfully obtained. Even when your capital comes from legitimate sources such as business income, family savings, or an inheritance, your application can still be denied if the documentation doesn’t clearly prove the lawful origin. We’ve guided numerous clients through this challenge by organizing detailed, credible evidence that satisfies consular scrutiny and results in E-2 visa approval. Many clients ask, “How do I prove the source of funds for an E2 visa?” To meet the E2 visa source of funds requirements, you must provide a detailed paper trail showing where every dollar came from. If you received money as a gift or…

I have posted a draft of my latest essay, How the Modalities Work: Constitutional Interpretation as Problem Solving, on SSRN. Here is the abstract:The modalities of constitutional argument are shared cultural tools for thinking about the Constitution, analyzing legal problems, and formulating arguments to resolve them. Constitutional interpretation is a kind of problem-solving, and the modalities are our legal culture’s tool kit for analyzing and solving constitutional problems.Many different kinds of history can help us make arguments with the modalities. Therefore there is no artificial limit on the kinds of history that can be relevant to constitutional interpretation. The central question is whether the history we employ furthers the specific kind of legal argument we are making.Our use of the modalities presumes that at any point in time some arguments are better than others. Disagreements about the Constitution are pervasive and may be never-ending, but this…